Re: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kasan: Support for r/w instrumentation control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Vaneet Narang <v.narang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  Hi,
>
>> Do you actually hit an issue with image size? In what context?
>> Do you use inline/outline instrumentation? Does switching to the other
>> option help?
>
> Memory access with KASAN enabled Image has overhead in terms of cpu execution.
> Sometimes we are not able to reproduce race condition issues with these overhead in
> place. So user should have control atleast over read instrumentation.

Don't you want to disable KASAN entirely in such case?


>> Does it make sense to ever disable writes? I assume that you are
>
> Write instrumentation control is majorly kept to be inline with ASAN for user space
> applications.
> Also write is sometimes useful when uImage is already sanitized and some corruption
> is done by kernel modules by doing some direct memory access then both read / write sanity of uImage
> can be avoided.

But then you don't need KASAN at all.


>> disabling reads, right?
>> Disabling both certainly does not make sense.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux