Dne 28.11.2016 v 07:44 Peter Foley napsal(a): > Fix reversed conditional checking if HOSTCC is clang. > Suppress warnings about unsupported optimization options. > Suppress warnings about unused functions, as they are generated for > every module and are therefore far too spammy. > Disable clang's integrated assembler which is incompatible with kernel > asm constructs. > > Changes from v1: > * Move the $(cc-name) conditional below the definition of $(CC) > Changes from v2: > * Actually commit the changes in v2. > Changes from v3: > * HOSTCC is not guaranteed to be the same as CC, adjust accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Foley <pefoley2@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Makefile | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index 694111b43cf8..9c4803a74117 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -301,12 +301,12 @@ CONFIG_SHELL := $(shell if [ -x "$$BASH" ]; then echo $$BASH; \ > > HOSTCC = gcc > HOSTCXX = g++ > -HOSTCFLAGS = -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -std=gnu89 > +HOSTCFLAGS = -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -std=gnu89 \ > + -Wno-unused-value -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-missing-field-initializers > HOSTCXXFLAGS = -O2 This adds new -Wno-* options also for the gcc case, is there a reason for this? Also, the -Wno-missing-field-initializers option is not available in some old gccs, so we would need a HOSTCC equivalent of cc-disable-warning. Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
