On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Some embedded systems have no use for them. This removes about
> 22KB from the kernel binary size when configured out.
>
> Corresponding syscalls are routed to a stub logging the attempt to
> use those syscalls which should be enough of a clue if they were
> disabled without proper consideration. They are: timer_create,
> timer_gettime: timer_getoverrun, timer_settime, timer_delete,
> clock_adjtime.
>
> The clock_settime, clock_gettime, clock_getres and clock_nanosleep
> syscalls are replaced by simple wrappers compatible with CLOCK_REALTIME,
> CLOCK_MONOTONIC and CLOCK_BOOTTIME only which should cover the vast
> majority of use cases with very little code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx>
So I have no design objections to the patch overall.
I ran this through my timekeeping tests last night and it passed a
fair number of the tests, considering.
I of course see a lot of failures around timer_creates failing
(set-timer-lat), and cases where clockids aren't supported.
So I'll need to see about updating the tests to fail more gracefully
with this change.
One spot of concern is that the
tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c test hangs testing
virtual itimers. Looking through the code I'm not seeing where an
error case is missed.
The strace looks like:
...
write(1, "Testing posix timers. False nega"..., 66Testing posix
timers. False negative may happen on CPU execution
) = 66
write(1, "based timers if other threads ru"..., 48based timers if
other threads run on the CPU...
) = 48
write(1, "Check itimer virtual... ", 24Check itimer virtual... ) = 24
rt_sigaction(SIGVTALRM, {0x400a80, [VTALRM], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART,
0x7fb73306ccb0}, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, 8) = 0
gettimeofday({1478710402, 937476}, NULL) = 0
setitimer(ITIMER_VIRTUAL, {it_interval={0, 0}, it_value={2, 0}}, NULL) = 0
<Hang>
Where as with posix timers enabled:
...
write(1, "Testing posix timers. False nega"..., 138Testing posix
timers. False negative may happen on CPU execution
based timers if other threads run on the CPU...
Check itimer virtual... ) = 138
rt_sigaction(SIGVTALRM, {0x400a80, [VTALRM], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART,
0x7f231ba8ccb0}, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, 8) = 0
gettimeofday({1478626751, 904856}, NULL) = 0
setitimer(ITIMER_VIRTUAL, {it_interval={0, 0}, it_value={2, 0}}, NULL) = 0
--- SIGVTALRM {si_signo=SIGVTALRM, si_code=SI_KERNEL} ---
rt_sigreturn() = 0
gettimeofday({1478626753, 906137}, NULL) = 0
write(1, "[OK]\nCheck itimer prof... ", 26[OK]
...
So I suspect you were a little too aggressive with the #ifdefs around
the itimers/signal code, or we need to make sure we return an error on
the setitimer ITIMER_VIRTUAL case as well.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
