Re: [PATCH 0/3 v3] kbuild changes, thin archives, --gc-sections

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 10:29:18 PM CEST Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> 
> I ended up deciding to do a v3, because I had several changes
> accumulated, as described in patches.
> 
> I've also left off the powerpc arch patches -- they can be found
> in previous posts, for reference.
> 
> I've again tested ARM and it seems to be building okay and without
> performance regression with my configurations. I think it's going
> to be a matter of some toolchain options for them to go through.
> arm64, x86, powerpc, and arm for me all built fine with thin archives
> and --gc-sections enabled, so I can't see there being a fundamental
> issue that can't be solved. Worst case, the incremental link option
> can remain for a time.
> 

I clearly want to use this on ARM, and I am still investigating
the performance regression that I see on my build box, but that
is no reason to delay your patches.

Everything looks good to me,

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux