Improper menuconfig usage leads to empty menu entries. zconfdump() is able to reveal some real-life examples: - menuconfig VFIO_NOIOMMU - menuconfig RESET_CONTROLLER - menuconfig SND_ARM To avoid future occurrences of those, improve the menuconfig syntax description. Signed-off-by: Eugeniu Rosca <rosca.eugeniu@xxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt b/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt index db10185..069fcb3 100644 --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt @@ -274,7 +274,44 @@ menuconfig: This is similar to the simple config entry above, but it also gives a hint to front ends, that all suboptions should be displayed as a -separate list of options. +separate list of options. To make sure all the suboptions will really +show up under the menuconfig entry and not outside of it, every item +from the <config options> list must depend on the menuconfig symbol. +In practice, this is achieved by using one of the next two constructs: + +(1): +menuconfig M +if M + config C1 + config C2 +endif + +(2): +menuconfig M +config C1 + depends on M +config C2 + depends on M + +In the following examples (3) and (4), C1 and C2 still have the M +dependency, but will not appear under menuconfig M anymore, because +of C0, which doesn't depend on M: + +(3): +menuconfig M + config C0 +if M + config C1 + config C2 +endif + +(4): +menuconfig M +config C0 +config C1 + depends on M +config C2 + depends on M choices: -- 2.9.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
