Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Mark functions with the __nocapture attribute

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 15:08 -0400, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Emese Revfy <re.emese@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > The nocapture gcc attribute can be on functions only.
>> > The attribute takes one or more unsigned integer constants as
>> > parameters
>> > that specify the function argument(s) of const char* type to
>> > initify.
>> > If the marked argument is a vararg then the plugin initifies
>> > all vararg arguments.
>>
>> Why is this called "nocapture"? Not captured by what? It seems like
>> it
>> means "initify this if possible". Am I misunderstanding its purpose?
>
> It means they don't escape via that function, i.e. they aren't stored
> anywhere to be used in any way after the call.

Ah, those arguments are confirmed to not be "captured" by that
function, leaving them available to be moved to .init. Got it, thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux