On Monday 02 May 2016 19:12:31 Olof Johansson wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sunday 01 May 2016 16:19:53 Olof Johansson wrote: > >> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Olof's autobuilder <build@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Here are the build results from automated periodic testing. > >> > > >> > The tree being built was mainline, found at: > >> > > >> > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git (master branch) > >> > > >> > Topmost commit: > >> > > >> > da9373d Merge branch 'fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal > >> > > >> > Build logs (stderr only) can be found at the following link (experimental): > >> > > >> > http://arm-soc.lixom.net/buildlogs/mainline/v4.6-rc5-224-gda9373d/ > >> > > >> > > >> > Runtime: 5m 0s > >> > > >> > Passed: 117 > >> > Failed: 1 > >> > > >> > Warnings: 896 > >> > > >> > Section mismatches: 0 > >> > >> So, yeah, I updated to GCC 6.1.0 and it looks noisy. If it doesn't get > >> whittled down pretty quickly I might switch to an older compiler > >> again. > > > > Oops, it looks like I never submitted a patch to shut up > > -Wunused-const-variable, though I've been building that way > > myself here and fixing all /other/ warnings. > > > > I think we want to have -Wunused-const-variable at the W=1 level, but > > not by default. > > Agreed, at least as long as it is as noisy as it is today. > > Care to send it in so we can see it in 4.6? Sure, I'll try. I seem to have a low success rate getting Makefile changes like this merged: My best guess is that Michal Marek should pick them up, but he ignored my last few submission for warning changes, so I don't know if I should instead send them to Andrew Morton or someone else. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
