On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 11:07:25 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I wonder if it might make sense to split the .so-building logic > changes from the gcc plugin changes to make things more readable for > review? Personally, I'm fine with this as-is, but it might benefit > other reviewers, if it's a sane split. I will split this patch in the next patch set. > > +GCC PLUGINS > > +M: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > +R: Emese Revfy <re.emese@xxxxxxxxx> > > +L: kernel-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > +S: Maintained > > +F: tools/gcc > > I think that needs a trailing slash to indicate it's a tree to match. I tested it with get_maintainer.pl and it is good. > > +F: Documentation/gcc-plugins.txt > > I wonder if this should be moved to Documentation/kbuild/ ? I don't know. Michal Marek, could you please tell me where I should put the documentation? -- Emese -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
