On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 08:50 +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > On 2015-10-01 08:14, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 22:46 +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > >> Dne 24.9.2015 v 00:16 Michael Ellerman napsal(a): > >>> On 23 September 2015 19:50:52 GMT+10:00, Michal Marek > >>> <mmarek@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> On 2015-09-23 07:40, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >>>>> +else ifneq ($(wildcard > >>>> arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)),) > >>>>> @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on > >>>> '$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" > >>>>> $(Q)$< $(silent) > >>>> --defconfig=arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) $(Kconfig) > >>>>> +else + @$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on target > >>>> '$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'" > >>>>> + $(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/Makefile $(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) endif > >>>> > >>>> What is the anticipated usage of this? The patch is not needed to > >>>> make > >>>> > >>>> make ppc64le_defconfig > >>>> > >>>> work with the second patch. If it was, this would create a loop > >>>> anyway. > >>> > >>> The idea is to make 'make defconfig' work when KBUILD_DEFCONFIG is > >>> ppc64le_defconfig (which happens for us when uname returns ppc64le) > >>> and additionally when ppc64le_defconfig is not a real file. > >> > >> Ah, that makes sense. You can add > >> > >> Acked-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxxx> > >> > >> if you want. > > > > Thanks. I'll assume by that you mean you're happy if I take both patches > > through the powerpc tree. > > Yes, I assumed that this was your plan. I didn't really have a plan :) It's certainly easiest if I take it in my tree along with the new ppc64le_defconfig, so I'll do that. Thanks. cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
