Re: [PATCH v4] Kconfig: Remove bad inference rules expr_eliminate_dups2()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 22.5.2015 v 19:41 Martin Walch napsal(a):
> From: Martin Walch <walch.martin@xxxxxx>
> 
> expr_eliminate_dups2() in scripts/kconfig/expr.c applies two invalid
> inference rules:
> 
> (FOO || BAR) && (!FOO && !BAR) -> n
> (FOO && BAR) || (!FOO || !BAR) -> y
> 
> They would be correct in propositional logic, but this is a three-valued
> logic, and here it is wrong in that it changes semantics. It becomes
> immediately visible when assigning the value 1 to both, FOO and BAR:
> 
> (FOO || BAR) && (!FOO && !BAR)
> -> min(max(1, 1), min(2-1, 2-1)) = min(1, 1) = 1
> 
> while n evaluates to 0 and
> 
> (FOO && BAR) || (!FOO || !BAR)
> -> max(min(1, 1), max(2-1, 2-1)) = max(1, 1) = 1
> 
> with y evaluating to 2.
> 
> Fix it by removing expr_eliminate_dups2() and the functions that have no
> use anywhere else: expr_extract_eq_and(), expr_extract_eq_or(),
> and expr_extract_eq() from scripts/kconfig/expr.c
> 
> Currently the bug is not triggered in mainline, so this patch does not
> modify the configuration space there. To observe the bug consider this
> example:
> 
> config MODULES
>         def_bool y
>         option modules
> 
> config FOO
>         def_tristate m
> 
> config BAR
>         def_tristate m
> 
> config TEST1
>         def_tristate y
>         depends on (FOO || BAR) && (!FOO && !BAR)
> 
> if TEST1 = n
> comment "TEST1 broken"
> endif
> 
> config TEST2
>         def_tristate y
>         depends on (FOO && BAR) || (!FOO || !BAR)
> 
> if TEST2 = y
> comment "TEST2 broken"
> endif
> 
> config TEST3
>         def_tristate y
>         depends on m && !m
> 
> if TEST3 = n
> comment "TEST3 broken"
> endif
> 
> TEST1, TEST2 and TEST3 should all evaluate to m, but without the patch,
> none of them does. It is probably not obvious that TEST3 is the same bug,
> but it becomes clear when considering what happens internally to the
> expression
> m && !m": 
> First it expands to
> (m && MODULES) && !(m && MODULES),
> then it is transformed into
> (m && MODULES) && (!m || !MODULES),
> and finally due to the bug it is replaced with n.
> 
> As a side effect, this patch reduces code size in expr.c by roughly 10%
> and slightly improves startup time for all configuration frontends.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Walch <walch.martin@xxxxxx>
> ---
> Version 3:
> Earlier versions fixed some comments, too. Remove those bits and focus
> on the logical problem.
> 
> Version 4:
> Add test case to commit description.

Thanks, applied now!

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux