On 2015-01-22 09:35, Paul Bolle wrote: > In this case 64BIT is set to 'y' (otherwise LBDAF would have been 'y'). > This isn't a bug issue, of course, but I still can see how this can be > confusing. Perhaps the last line should read: > Unmet dependency on: BLOCK [=y] && !64BIT [=y] > > Would that help? Or would > Depends on: BLOCK [=y] && !64BIT [=n] > > (ie, print the value if "!64BIT") be clearer? How about Depends on: (BLOCK [=y] && !64BIT [=y]) [=n] ? Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
