On 15/12/14 11:47, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 15.12.14 at 12:38, <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 11/12/14 18:04, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> --- a/arch/x86/syscalls/Makefile >>> +++ b/arch/x86/syscalls/Makefile >> >> Why are these changes here and not in arch/x86/xen/Makefile? > > Because this needs to be done in a step that (afaict) has no hook > in the Xen-specific Makefile. > >>> @@ -47,10 +50,16 @@ $(out)/syscalls_32.h: $(syscall32) $(systbl) >>> $(out)/syscalls_64.h: $(syscall64) $(systbl) >>> $(call if_changed,systbl) >>> >>> +$(out)/xen-hypercalls.h: $(srctree)/scripts/xen-hypercalls.sh >>> + $(call if_changed,hypercalls) >>> + >>> +$(out)/xen-hypercalls.h: $(srctree)/include/xen/interface/xen*.h >> >> The generated header should end up in asm/xen/ > > Why is generated/asm/ not good enough? I meant something like generated/asm/xen/hypercall-macros.h So a "xen/" prefix which is consistent with all the other xen specific headers. But if this is non-trivial it's not a major issue. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html