>>> On 04.11.14 at 14:28, <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 13:20 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> + if (k1 == k_string || k2 == k_string)
>> >> + res = strcmp(str1, str2);
>> >> + else if (k1 == k_invalid || k2 == k_invalid) {
>> >> + if (e->type != E_EQUAL && e->type != E_UNEQUAL) {
>> >> + printf("Cannot compare \"%s\" and \"%s\"\n", str1, str2);
>> >> +printf("(%s -> %d, %s -> %d)\n", sym_type_name(e->left.sym->type), k1,
>> > sym_type_name(e->right.sym->type), k2);//temp
>> >
>> > Leftover from development?
>>
>> Argh - yes, definitely; I even have a note in the patch that these
>> should get dropped, but I managed to ignore that note.
>
> If all you have to change is drop those three lines, I'll play with this
> patch anyway, as I finally maltreated it enough to apply on top of my
> local changes.
Yes, unless other comments require me to make further changes,
this is all I currently see needing adjustment and re-sending.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
