On 8/13/14 16:03, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > CC kbuild > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> index c49a775..0510a5d 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> @@ -199,6 +199,11 @@ config NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE >> config ARCH_SUPPORTS_UPROBES >> def_bool y >> >> +config CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN >> + depends on !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN >> + def_bool y >> + >> + >> config ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_COHERENT_MASK >> bool > > As this is a common symbol, and replicated for all affected architectures, > I'm wondering if we should have the "config CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN" in > common Kconfig code instead, and make the individual architectures do a > "select CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN"? > That sounds a good idea to me. > Also we could have "config CPU_BIG_ENDIAN", too, and error out > if none or both are selected (can Kconfig error out?). > It is a good idea to me, welcome any members ideas, especially Kbuild members' ideas, suggestions or completions. Thanks. -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
