On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Dne 13.6.2014 19:29, Andy Lutomirski napsal(a): >> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Dne 13.6.2014 11:39, Michal Marek napsal(a): >>>> Based on a x86-only patch by Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> With modular kernels, 'make install' is going to need the installed >>>> modules at some point to generate the initramfs. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> Makefile | 6 ++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile >>>> index 7680d7c..7e5e483 100644 >>>> --- a/Makefile >>>> +++ b/Makefile >>>> @@ -503,6 +503,12 @@ ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) >>>> endif >>>> endif >>>> endif >>>> +# install and module_install need also be processed one by one >>>> +ifneq ($(filter install,$(MAKECMDGOALS)),) >>>> + ifneq ($(filter modules_install,$(MAKECMDGOALS)),) >>>> + mixed-targets := 1 >>>> + endif >>>> +endif >>> >>> Note that this version does not enforce the ordering, it just avoids the >>> interleaved execution. It can be added if desired. >> >> Hmm. This will fix 'make modules_install install' but will not fix >> 'make install modules_install'. I don't know how many people would >> type the latter. > > Resuming a thread from last month -- As I said, it does not enforce the > ordering. So it's not as bullet-proof as your patch, but it works on all > architectures. I'm thinking about adding the patch to kbuild.git for > 3.17. But if you want to fix the ordering as well, feel free to change > the __build_one_by_one rule to do this. Sounds good to me. Where's __build_one_by_one? --Andy > > Thanks, > Michal -- Andy Lutomirski AMA Capital Management, LLC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
