On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 08:04 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 01:21 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > The Debian armhf architecture uses the ARM EABI hard-float variant, > > whereas armel uses the soft-float variant. Although the kernel > > doesn't use FP itself, CONFIG_VFP must be enabled to support > > hard-float userland and will probably be disabled when supporting a > > soft-float userland. So set the architecture to armhf by default when > > CONFIG_AEABI and CONFIG_VFP are both enabled. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > We should also add the following. If there is some reason to do a v3 > feel free to squash it into you patch (if you wish). [...] arm64 is already in -next. Actually, that means my patch is fuzzy as it's based on v3.15. I hope that's OK. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings DNRC Motto: I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
