>> On 05/10/2014 10:02 PM, George Spelvin wrote: >>> - For consistency, objects listed in lib-m will be included in lib.a. >>> + >>> + For consistency, objects listed in lib-m will be included >>> + in lib.a, but this will probably not do what you want. Sam Ravneborg wrote: > So maybe we should catch this and error out? Given my current poor state of knowledge, that does indeed seem like a better solution; I can't imagine a situation where the current behavior is useful. But can we not stall a straightforward and harmless documentation upgrade waiting for a more ambitious solution? A significant change to kbuild like that is going to trigger a (beneficial, but slow) wave of bug reports and Kconfig/Makefile fixes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
