On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:33:49PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Does anyone have any objection to the use of "#pragma once" instead of > > the usual #ifndef-#define-...-#endif include guard? GCC, LLVM/clang, > > and the latest Sparse all support either method just fine. (I added > > support to Sparse myself.) Both have equivalent performance. "#pragma > > once" is simpler, and avoids the possibility of a typo in the defined > > guard symbol. > > Does anybody know whether other static code analysis tools such as > Coverity can handle #pragma once? Coverity should be fine. If it does break, I'm sure they'd fix it. Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
