Re: [PATCH 1/4] kconfig: add short explanation to SYMBOL_WRITE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/expr.h b/scripts/kconfig/expr.h
> > index df198a5..ba663e1 100644
> > --- a/scripts/kconfig/expr.h
> > +++ b/scripts/kconfig/expr.h
> > @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct symbol {
> >  #define SYMBOL_CHOICEVAL  0x0020  /* used as a value in a choice block */
> >  #define SYMBOL_VALID      0x0080  /* set when symbol.curr is calculated */
> >  #define SYMBOL_OPTIONAL   0x0100  /* choice is optional - values can be 'n' */
> > -#define SYMBOL_WRITE      0x0200  /* ? */
> > +#define SYMBOL_WRITE      0x0200  /* write symbol to file (KCONFIG_CONFIG) */
> >  #define SYMBOL_CHANGED    0x0400  /* ? */
> >  #define SYMBOL_AUTO       0x1000  /* value from environment variable */
> >  #define SYMBOL_CHECKED    0x2000  /* used during dependency checking */
> 
> Perhaps stating that the choice is writable by the user?

As far as I understand SYMBOL_WRITE, its main purpose is in the function
conf_write in confdata.c:

>if (!(sym->flags & SYMBOL_WRITE))
>	goto next;
>sym->flags &= ~SYMBOL_WRITE;
>
>conf_write_symbol(out, sym, &kconfig_printer_cb, NULL);

So, if I have not missed anything, SYMBOL_WRITE decides whether to write a symbol
to .config or not. This does not necessarily mean that the user can change the value.
SYMBOL_WRITE may be set and the symbol may be written to .config while the user
does not even see the corresponding prompt.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux