On 08/22/2013 01:41 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
On 08/22/2013 07:58:26 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > The series touches also m68k, sh, mips and unicore32. >> > These architectures magically select a cross compiler if ARCH != SUBARCH. >> > Do really need that behavior? >> >> This does remove functionality. >> It allows to build a kernel using e.g. "make ARCH=m68k". >> >> Perhaps this can be moved to generic code? Most (not all!) cross-toolchains >> are called $ARCH-{unknown-,}linux{,-gnu}. >> Exceptions are e.g. am33_2.0-linux and bfin-uclinux. > > Today you can specify CROSS_COMPILE in Kconfig. > With this we should be able to remove these hacks. The correct CROSS_COMPILE value depends on the host environment, not on the target configuration.Actually it depends on _both_.
I think the important issue is not the exact dependencies of the value of CROSS_COMPILE, but rather that it varies enough that automatically choosing a value based on SUBARCH often gives the wrong result.
Removing SUBARCH and setting CROSS_COMPILE either from the make command line (or environment) or the config file, is a good idea because it simplifies the build system, makes things clearer, and yields more predictable results.
David Daney -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
