> > So as a summarry, here are the three options: > - update existing frontends against their respective framework > - add two new frontends, and two new goals to call them > - add two new frontends, and decide whether to call them or the old ones > > Really, I have no idea what is best. As per my other mail the best candidate is "- update existing frontends against their respective framework". Because: - There exist a fallback for users that do not have the never libs available - The gtk/qt frontends see only little love&care - so coming up with something that require more love&care is not good - And we know that we have a person to look after the problems that is introduced at lest for a few months. We should carefully review the patches to make sure the resulting code is maintainable in the long term. I assume this is more or less a no-brainer. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
