On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:33:04PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Previously, the #line parsing regex ended with ({WS}+[0-9]+)?. The {WS}
> could match line-break characters. If the #line directive did not contain
> the optional flags field at the end, this could cause any integer data on
> the next line to be consumed as part of the #line directive parsing. This
> could cause syntax errors (i.e. #line parsing consuming the leading 0
> from a hex literal 0x1234, leaving x1234 to be parsed as cell data,
> which is a syntax error), or invalid compilation results (i.e. simply
> consuming literal 1234 as part of the #line processing, thus removing it
> from the cell data).
>
> Fix this by replacing {WS} with [ \t] so that it can't match line-breaks.
>
> Convert all instances of {WS}, even though the other instances should be
> irrelevant for any well-formed #line directive. This is done for
> consistency and ultimate safety.
>
> Reported-by: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
Nice catch.
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I'll pull it into my github tree. Jon, please either apply directly
or pull from my tree.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
