On 04/04/2013 05:17 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On 04/03/2013 06:34 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> The recent dtc+cpp support allows header files and C pre-processor >> defines/macros to be used when compiling device tree files. These >> headers will typically define various constants that are part of the >> device tree bindings. >> >> The original patch which set up the dtc+cpp include path only considered >> using those headers from device tree files. However, most are also >> useful for kernel code which needs to interpret the device tree. >> >> In both the DT files and the kernel, I'd like to include the DT-related >> headers in the same way, for example, <dt-bindings/gpio/tegra-gpio.h>. >> That will simplify any text which discusses the DT header locations. >> >> Creating a <dt-bindings/> for kernel source to use is as simple as >> placing files into include/dt-bindings/. >> >> However, when compiling DT files, the include path should be restricted >> so that only the dt-bindings path is available; arbitrary kernel headers >> shouldn't be exposed. For this reason, create a specific include >> directory for use by dtc+cpp, and symlink dt-bindings from there to the >> actual location of include/dt-bindings/. For want of a better location, >> place this "include chroot" into the existing dts/ directory. >> >> arch/*/boot/dts/include/dt-bindings -> ../../../../../include/dt-bindings >> >> Some headers used by device tree files may not be useful to the kernel; >> they may be used simply to aid in constructing the DT file (e.g. macros >> to create a node), but not define any information that the kernel needs >> to share. These may be placed directly into arch/*/boot/dts/ along with >> the DT files themselves. >> >> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Grant, Rob, Michal, I'm hoping for acks or comments from you so this >> series can be placed into a topic branch in the arm-soc repo, for others >> to build on during the 3.10 kernel cycle. Thanks. > > Well, you have mine here and the rest looks fine, so add it to the others. Rob, I had originally hoped for this to go into an arm-soc branch so that a number of SoCs could convert to use the feature in the same release, hence I was looking for acks to let that happen. However, it's too late in the 3.10 cycle now for that to happen. Can the series be applied to the DT tree instead; people can convert during the 3.11 cycle. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
