On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Joe Perches wrote: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/29/145 Connecting to lkml.org (lkml.org)|87.253.128.182|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 500 Server Error > I did not and do not see significant value in > adding LZ4 given Markus' LZO improvements. Please someone post a comprehensive comparison with all the results in the same email. > The new LZO code is faster than ever and it's > a standalone improvement. > > Why would the LZO code not be updated? It is used by filesystems, etc. So of course it needs to be updated to faster code. > Markus has posted what seems a clean git pull > request. It was not cc'd to arm or linux-arch. > > http://linux-kernel.2935.n7.nabble.com/GIT-PULL-Update-LZO-compression-code-for-v3-9-td605184.html Maybe a reminder should be sent to Linus about this. >From the above we can see this: **LZO-2013-UA : updated LZO version available in linux-next plus experimental ARM Unaligned Access patch. This needs approval from some ARM maintainer ist NOT YET INCLUDED. What is that experimental patch in need of approval? Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
