Re: [PATCH 46/74] x86, lto: Disable fancy hweight optimizations for LTO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/19/2012 05:56 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The fancy x86 hweight uses different compiler options for the
> hweight file. This does not work with LTO. Just disable the optimization
> with LTO
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                    |    5 +++--
>  arch/x86/include/asm/arch_hweight.h |    9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 8ec3a1a..9382b09 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -224,8 +224,9 @@ config X86_32_LAZY_GS
>  
>  config ARCH_HWEIGHT_CFLAGS
>  	string
> -	default "-fcall-saved-ecx -fcall-saved-edx" if X86_32
> -	default "-fcall-saved-rdi -fcall-saved-rsi -fcall-saved-rdx -fcall-saved-rcx -fcall-saved-r8 -fcall-saved-r9 -fcall-saved-r10 -fcall-saved-r11" if X86_64
> +	default "-fcall-saved-ecx -fcall-saved-edx" if X86_32 && !LTO
> +	default "-fcall-saved-rdi -fcall-saved-rsi -fcall-saved-rdx -fcall-saved-rcx -fcall-saved-r8 -fcall-saved-r9 -fcall-saved-r10 -fcall-saved-r11" if X86_64 && !LTO
> +	default "" if LTO
>  

Seems heavy handed.  How about using __attribute__((optimize(...))) instead?


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux