On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:17:09 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Randy, > > On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:13:20 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:10:03 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:37:53 +0200 Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > > > At Sun, 24 Jul 2011 12:26:24 -0700, > > > > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:33:30 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/ad1816a/ad1816a_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_disable': => 544 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/ad1816a/ad1816a_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_pointer': => 302 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/ad1816a/ad1816a_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program': => 244 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/es1688/es1688_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_pointer': => 509 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/es1688/es1688_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program': => 417 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/gus/gus_dma.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_disable': => 177 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/gus/gus_dma.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program': => 79 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/gus/gus_pcm.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_pointer': => 619 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/gus/gus_pcm.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program': => 591 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/sb/sb16_main.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_pointer': => 456 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/sb/sb16_main.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program': => 276 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/sb/sb8_main.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_pointer': => 425 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/sb/sb8_main.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program': => 172 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/sscape.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program': => 481 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/wss/wss_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_disable': => 1695 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/wss/wss_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_pointer': => 1160 > > > > > > + src/sound/isa/wss/wss_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program': => 1025 > > > > > > > > > > All of these source files do #include <sound/core.h>, > > > > > but these missing/implicit functions are conditional: > > > > > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API > > > > > #define DMA_MODE_NO_ENABLE 0x0100 > > > > > > > > > > void snd_dma_program(unsigned long dma, unsigned long addr, unsigned int size, unsigned short mode); > > > > > void snd_dma_disable(unsigned long dma); > > > > > unsigned int snd_dma_pointer(unsigned long dma, unsigned int size); > > > > > #endif > > > > > > > > > > so should these drivers all depend on ISA_DMA_API ? > > > > > > > > Yes, these are ISA sound cards, so they must have CONFIG_ISA and > > > > CONFIG_ISA_DMA. Although CONFIG_SND_SB8_DSP, CONFIG_SND_SB16_DSP > > > > and CONFIG_SND_WSS_LIB have no direct dependency, but the drivers > > > > selecting these are all in "if SND_ISA" in sound/isa/Kconfig. > > > > > > Hm, yes, they are. > > > > > > > > or should only pieces of each driver depend on ISA_DMA_API ? > > > > > > > > I wonder which configuration makes it possible. > > > > Did you see a similar problem with randconfig? > > > > > > No. This parisc allmodconfig file from linux-next builds has > > > CONFIG_SND_ISA=y but it does not have CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API enabled. Weird. > > > > > > Geert, do you know how this happens? > > > > > > parisc config: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/4323458/config/ > > > from this failed build: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/4323458/ > > > > How is CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API enabled in parisc allmodconfig? > > I don't see how that happens, and it's causing build errors... > > Sorry, but I don't understand the question. The problam is that > CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API is not enabled, right? On parisc, it is just (from > arch/parisc/Kconfig) > > config ISA_DMA_API > bool > > and nothing selects it. However, I would have expected an allmodconfig > to set it to y. Clearly I don't understan how allmodconfig works any > more :-( > > Michal, is my understanding correct? Is this a bug in allmodconfig? When I do: $ make ARCH=parisc O=PAR allmodconfig I don't get CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API enabled, so the question is simply how is the linux-next build system ending up with CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API enabled? What commands are used to cause this? --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
