On Mon, 30 May 2011 16:50:50 +0200, Michal Marek said: > + expr $(VERSION) \* 65536 + $(PATCHLEVEL) \* 256 + 0$(SUBLEVEL)); \ expr isn't going to interpret that last field as octal, is it?
Attachment:
pgp2cZha5oBgQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 30 May 2011 16:50:50 +0200, Michal Marek said: > + expr $(VERSION) \* 65536 + $(PATCHLEVEL) \* 256 + 0$(SUBLEVEL)); \ expr isn't going to interpret that last field as octal, is it?
Attachment:
pgp2cZha5oBgQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|