On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:52:35PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > > On 22.4.2011 19:50, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Building a kernel with "make W=1" produce far too much noise > > > to be usefull. > > > > > > Divide the warning options in three groups: > > > > > > W=1 - warnings that may be relevant and does not occur too often > > > W=2 - warnings that occur quite often but may still be relevant > > > W=3 - the more obscure warnings, can most likely be ignored > > > > > > When building init/ on my box the levels produces: > > > > > > W=1 - 46 warnings > > > W=2 - 863 warnings > > > W=3 - 6496 warnings > > > > I guess these numbers are not valid after your changes? Not that the > > exact numbers are important, but maybe the distribution change? > > I think so too that those numbers don't mean a lot. The numbers _only_ tell you that the amoun of warnings on W=1 is down to a manageable number and they increase be the higher level. Will you cook up a more correct changelog and resubmit? Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
