On 22/04/2011 12:58 ÏÎ, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 23:39 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> Building a kernel with "make W=1" produce far too much noise >> to be usefull. >> Divide the warning options in three groups: >> W=1 - usefull warning options >> W=2 - noisy but semi usefull warnign options >> W=3 - almost pure noise options >> +warning-1 := -Wextra > [] >> +warning-2 += -Waggregate-return > This is a different form for this first warning-2 declaration > than the first warning-1 declaration. > > Maybe this should be := instead? yeap...for the first warning-3 assignment too... maybe something like this: warning-1:= warning-2:= warning-3:= right after 'ifeq' could help, so that you can alter/test the warnings' levels more easily(without having to change between := and += for the first warning of each warning level). -- Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
