On 10.4.2011 16:31, Valentin Ochs wrote: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 11:34:00PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Valentin Ochs <a@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> The three patched files use PATH_MAX without defining the required >>> _POSIX_C_SOURCE feature test macro. This prevents compilation with the >>> musl libc. The patch applies to 2.6.38.2. >>> >>> Changes since v1: >>> - fix scripts/kconfig/lex.zconf.c_shipped >> this file is autogenerated from zconf.l, which should be updated as >> well. I'm not sure how you searched for PATH_MAX, but you're still >> missing `confdata.c' and `nconf.c'. Yes, please fix the bison parser and run make GENERATE_PARSER=1 menuconfig to update the *_shipped files. >> I had a quick look to different libc implementation, glibc and uClibc >> default to _POSIX_C_SOURCE == 200112L, FreeBSD >8.0 defaults to >> 200809L for >8.0, FreeBSD 7.x to 200112L. > > I got the value I used from the Open Group System Interfaces > specification, but the musl author said that 200112L would be fine too. I suggest you use 200112L, so that it is a nop for glibc/uClibc builds. Please also accompany it with a /* for PATH_MAX */ comment or so. > >> None of these seems to requires _POSIX_C_SOURCE to define PATH_MAX, so >> I'm not certain of the requirement of the change. > > While I don't want to appear like a language lawyer, the specification > says that 'all symbols required by POSIX.1-2008 to appear when the > header is included shall be made visible' when an application defines > _POSIX_C_SOURCE. I guess the musl author interprets that as 'if you > don't define the feature test macros, you're not getting PATH_MAX.' This > does not seem to be incorrect behaviour to me. While I don't completely understand the motivation for such super-pedantic libc implementation, the fact is that POSIX says one should define this macro, so let's define it, it does not hurt us. Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html