On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 08:35:12AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 17:05:01 +0100 Ulf Magnusson wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 07:57:34AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:48:32 +0100 Ulf Magnusson wrote: > > > > > > > linux-kbuild and linux-doc dropped both of my Kconfiglib patches, while > > > > linux-kernel accepted them: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/1/439 (initial) > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/5/174 (version 2) > > > > > > > > Any idea why? Looked over SubmittingPatches but couldn't find anything > > > > obvious. > > > > > > AFAIK, lkml has a message size limit of 300 KB or 400 KB, while > > > kbuild and doc have a limit of (probably) 100 KB. > > > > > Version 2 is only 13k though - it builds on the first one. > > OK, then you can try some of the Supplementary tools at > http://vger.kernel.org/ and/or check the taboo list to see if your > patch includes things that are not allowed: > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html#taboo > > If all else fails, you can ask <postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> . > Never mind, it appears at http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-kbuild/ now. Strangely, so does this thread. Maybe I just got lucky with the timing, or the archive updates work in mysterious ways.. Excuse the spam. /Ulf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
