Re: [PATCH] miscellaneous Kconfig cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 04:29:35PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Even generally, having a defualt of "n" isn't very useful (as that's
> what kconfig defaults to anyway), but it is potentially going to cause
> confusion when enforced on options with invisible (or even withou any
> prompt: If such an option's prompt becomes visible later, the user
> will not be asked whether (s)he wants to turn on the option.
> 
> Besides that, use def_bool instead of the bool/default pair to make
> things a little shorter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>

You can add
Acked-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
on the patch if you like, but IMO this should go as individual patches
to the subsystem maintainers. Alternatively, you could use
trivial@xxxxxxxxxx for such tree-wide fix.

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux