On 5 December 2010 16:51, trapDoor <trapdoor6@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:42:46 +0000 trapDoor wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> I couldn't wait and I merged the changes into my copy of mainline >>> tree. The merge was successful, no conflicts and the merge-diffstat >>> was exactly the same as above. However, when Ârunning oldconfig on the >>> patched kernel I still get lots of warnings: >>> >>> warning: (GPIO_RDC321X && PCI && GPIOLIB) selects MFD_RDC321X which >>> has unmet direct dependencies (MFD_SUPPORT && PCI) >>> warning: (I2C_ISCH && I2C && PCI || GPIO_SCH && GPIOLIB && PCI || >>> GPIO_VX855 && GPIOLIB || GPIO_RDC321X && PCI && GPIOLIB || [...] >>> MFD_JZ4740_ADC && MFD_SUPPORT && MACH_JZ4740 || MFD_TPS6586X && >>> MFD_SUPPORT && I2C=y && GPIOLIB && GENERIC_HARDIRQS || MFD_VX855 && >>> MFD_SUPPORT && PCI) selects MFD_CORE which has unmet direct >>> dependencies (MFD_SUPPORT) >> >> That's 2 warnings. ÂI have sent a patch for the first one. >> Looks like I need to resend it. > > I was actually impressed by the amount of lines produced by those two > warnings :) I'd call it 'a lot'. This could be simplified to only show the first option of every '&&' expression, something like below: warning: I2C_ISCH selects MFD_CORE... warning: GPIO_SCH selects MFD_CORE... But I couldn't figure out whether the expression reduction code in kbuild reorders the options or not. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
