On 5.12.2010 17:13, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:42 AM, trapDoor <trapdoor6@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi Linus, >>> >>> please pull these kbuild/kconfig fixes for the next -rc. The largest >>> part are fixes for the annoying kconfig warnings, contributed by Arnaud >>> Lacombe and Mauro Carvalho Chehab. The solution adds a new 'visible if' >>> keyword to the Kconfig language, so it's not exactly something that one >>> would expect in the rc phase, but the kconfig change is not huge (the >>> large diff is due to generated files) and it is deployed only in those >>> five Kconfig files that had the warnings and were hard to fix by other >>> means. The second part is a forgotten patch by Hendrik Brueckner to >>> usr/initramfs, that fixes build for Blackfin and h8300. >> Hello, >> I couldn't wait and I merged the changes into my copy of mainline >> tree. The merge was successful, no conflicts and the merge-diffstat >> was exactly the same as above. However, when running oldconfig on the >> patched kernel I still get lots of warnings: >> <sip> >> > Technically, this is two warning, though really verbose :) > >> >> Were these warnings supposed to be fixed by this patch set as well? Or >> is it something in my config (attached)? >> > No. The kconfig language update is meant to be a solution for the +150 > warnings triggered by the media and i2c tree, without making it > impossible to maintain. The notion of "dependency" was too strong for > the expected usage. Yes, sorry for giving false hopes in my mail :-). Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
