Re: [PATCH] kconfig: make randconfig fair for booleans

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/26/10 06:52, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 26.7.2010 11:59, Michal Marek wrote:
>> On 23.7.2010 23:11, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>> Give boolean symbols a 50% chance of getting enabled, rather than 67%.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Good catch!
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Michal - I assume you apply this for next merge window.
>>
>> Yes, will do. I've been busy (again :)) for the last two weeks, so only
>> reviewed the few patches for .35.
> 
> Applied now.
> 
> CCing Randy. FYI, you'll see a little less builds with CONFIG_MODULES=y
> starting with tomorrow's linux-next. It should not matter unless you're
> maintaining some statistics.

Thanks.  Not a problem.  No stats.

-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux