Dear Grant Likely, In message <fa686aa41001022113o46bad9d2xf6c026f5fa3e8677@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> you wrote: > > > Let's make this "uImage.old" (or "uImage.legacy" similar) and > > "uImage", then. > > I'm not interested in renaming the target name for the current uImage > format. I think it will cause too much breakage and pain to do so. We did this before, and the argument then was "progress". Keep in mind that the old arch/ppc uImage file is much more compatible to the current arch/powerpc "cuImage" target than to the current "uImage". I think the same should be done here. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@xxxxxxx Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature. - Rich Kulawiec -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html