On 16.12.2009 05:56, Vadim Bendebury (вб) wrote:
> 2009/12/15 Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>:
>> struct somename {
>> struct gstr *gstr;
>> int width;
>> /* other bookkeeping stuff like last_line_length */
>> }
>>
>> Then expr_gstr_print would just initialize an instance of this structure
>> and pass it to expr_print as the callback argument.
>
> I first thought about it, but decided against it, because the way it
> is now it is a much more contained change. Yes, recalculating string
> length every time is excessive, but in this particular case it is
> harmless.I am also worried of the string modified elsewhere bypassing
> the print helper function, which would take things out of sync and
> cause corrupted data.
expr_print() only sees a void pointer, so it can't modify any data
hidden behind it. But I don't care, do it as you like, just please move
the ncurses calls to menuconfig.
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
