Rob Landley wrote: > On Thursday 10 December 2009 07:52:44 Michal Marek wrote: >> and the makefile would run timeconst.pl to generate timeconst_custom.h >> iff HZ is set to something arbitrary. I don't have a patch for that, but >> I don't see a fundamental problem with such approach. > > I looked at that when I was attempting to update (rather than replace) my > original patch. There's a reason I didn't go there. You're suggesting there > be two code paths, one maintained by hand and the other just about never > tested against bit-rot. OK, that's valid point, indeed. Peter, would you ack Rob's patch with the oneline fix added (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/8/94 plus http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/9/435)? Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
