Re: "header-y" versus "unifdef-y"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 08:25:03AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> >   is it my imagination, or did someone recently propose that there
> > will soon be no distinction between those two Kbuild directives since
> > it's just as easy to "unifdef" all of them, no matter what?  has that
> > patch already been submitted for the next major release?
>
> Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt:
>
>         --- 7.4 unifdef-y (deprecated)
>
>         unifdef-y is deprecated. A direct replacement is header-y.
>
>
> That should answer your Q.

  ah, quite right, thanks.  i remembered someone saying that would
happen eventually, i didn't realize it had *already* happened.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

        Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
"Kernel Newbie Corner" column @ linux.com:          http://cli.gs/WG6WYX
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux