If the port does not support HAVE_PERF_COUNTERS, then they can't support the perf_counter_open syscall either. Rather than forcing everyone to add an ignore (or suffer the warning until they get around to implementing support), only whine about the syscall when applicable. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> --- scripts/checksyscalls.sh | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/checksyscalls.sh b/scripts/checksyscalls.sh index 60d00d1..90fb953 100755 --- a/scripts/checksyscalls.sh +++ b/scripts/checksyscalls.sh @@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ cat << EOF #define __IGNORE_sync_file_range #endif +/* if the port doesn't have support for it yet */ +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_PERF_COUNTERS +#define __IGNORE_perf_counter_open +#endif + /* Unmerged syscalls for AFS, STREAMS, etc. */ #define __IGNORE_afs_syscall #define __IGNORE_getpmsg -- 1.6.3.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
