On Friday 12 June 2009, Patrick Ringl wrote: > the README simply points to a wrong/non-existent directory where the default > configurations are not suited, hence the patch. On six architectures, it's still the right directory, your patch breaks it. > Signed-off-by: Patrick Ringl <patrick_@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- linux.orig/README 2009-06-10 05:05:27.000000000 +0200 > +++ linux/README 2009-06-12 10:46:15.000000000 +0200 > @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ > Like above, but avoids cluttering the screen > with questions already answered. > "make defconfig" Create a ./.config file by using the default > - symbol values from arch/$ARCH/defconfig. > + symbol values from arch/$ARCH/configs/*_defconfig. > "make allyesconfig" > Create a ./.config file by setting symbol > values to 'y' as much as possible. You could write e.g. default symbol values from one of arch/{$ARCH}/defconfig or arch/${ARCH}/configs/${PLATFORM}_defconfig, depending on the architecture. It would also be consistent to list the specific defconfigs here, like "make ${PLATFORM}_defconfig" Create a ./.config file by using the default symbol values from arch/${ARCH}/configs/${PLATFORM}_defconfig. Use "make help" to see a list of the available platforms on your architecture. Not also that your patch should be merged through a subsystem maintainer. If you don't know who that is, use scripts/get_maintainer.pl. For scripts/kconfig/* and README it suggests sending it to Sam, Roman and linux-kbuild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, which sounds right. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html