* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > Since this option can also be used for helping embedded > > developers (I used it for that) I would not want to bloat the > > kernel with running a script that is suppose to minimize it. But > > if IKCONFIG && !IKCONFIG_PROC does not add more data to the > > kernel, then I would be happy to turn it on by default. > > Actually, I can let the user decide. If it sees that IKCONFIG is > not set, it can remove it from the .config output. When the > silentoldconfig runs afterwards, it will ask the user if they want > to enable it. No, please offer reasonable non-interactive default behavior. It's pretty well-defined, and it can be engineered to be self-sufficient as well. Why not do that? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
