Re: Do we really need file `all'?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Jike Song <albcamus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
>  In commit a680eedc6c621c75695c68198533fc3c98f4053b you introduced the
> following code:
>
>        exuberant()
>        {
>                all_sources > all
>                all_sources | xargs ....{snip}...
>
> This will generate a regular file named `all' in the repository, which
> is not included in .gitignore.
> Do we really need this file? I think the second run of all_source is
> enough.  Or otherwise should
> we add it into .gitignore?
>
> I'm not subscribing linux-kbuild list so please CC me in replies, thanks.
>

Besides, there are still some asm-{arch} under include/ now.  The
current kbuild/scripts will find them by default, which seems not to
be a good idea:


$ grep "include/asm-" cscope.files |awk -F"/" '{ print $2 }'|uniq
asm-generic
asm-frv
asm-h8300
asm-m68k
asm-mn10300
asm-m32r
asm-arm
asm-xtensa


-- 
Thanks,
Jike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux