On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 12:26:05AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 December 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > I have used the following include guard:
> > > >
> > > > #ifdef __uClinux__
> > > > #include "atomic_no.h"
> > > > #else
> > > > #include "atomic_mm.h"
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> > > > gcc -E -dM for the two compilers revealed that this was the
> > > > only symbol that differed.
> > >
> > > I think you can share a toolchain for m68k and m68knommu, at least for the
> > > kernel (I used my plain m68k toolchain when experimenting with m68knommu for
> > > Amiga).
> > >
> > > > With the above construct we do the "right thing" also for
> > > > headers exported to userspace.
> > > > But actually none of the headers using the above are
> > > > subject for export at the moment so we could use a
> > > > CONFIG_ symbol for the same.
> > >
> > > So I prefer to just check CONFIG_MMU.
> >
> > Some of them are, by means of include/asm-generic/Kbuild.asm, e.g.
> > unistd.h!
Interesting, I'd expect unistd.h to be the same!
Ah, it's the restart_syscall:
--- include/asm-m68k/unistd.h 2008-10-18 10:34:15.000000000 +0200
+++ arch/m68knommu/include/asm/unistd.h 2008-10-12 14:08:01.000000000 +0200
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
* This file contains the system call numbers.
*/
+#define __NR_restart_syscall 0
#define __NR_exit 1
#define __NR_fork 2
#define __NR_read 3
@@ -359,9 +360,6 @@
#define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SIGPROCMASK
#define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGACTION
-/* whitelist for checksyscalls */
-#define __IGNORE_restart_syscall
-
/*
* "Conditional" syscalls
*
Sorry, I don't know about syscall restart handling, and why it differs. Anyone
who can enlighten me?
> I was fooled by make headers_check showing no errros.
> But it turns out that headers_check does not recognize
> includes made with "".
>
> So I will update the patch to include revevant *_{no,mm}.h files
> in Kbuild.
>
> >
> > I'm not sure if it's entirely correct, but I think you can use
> >
> > #ifdef __KERNEL__
> > # ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> > # include "atomic_mm.h
> > # else
> > # include "atomic_no.h
> > # endif
> > #else
> > # ifndef __uClinux__
> > # include "atomic_mm.h
> > # else
> > # include "atomic_no.h
> > # endif
> > #endif
>
> Can someone with a shared (m68k/m68knommu) please check if
> __uClinux__ is only set in the m68knommu case.
^^^^
always and only
>
> Use:
>
> touch foo.h; gcc -E -dM
>
> to see what is defined by the compiler.
> You will also need to specify if this is for m68k or m68knommu.
Still, I don't see why the compiler needs to be aware of being configured for
m68k or m68knommu, so IMHO this is a very fragile test...
What are the other exported headers that differ?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
