On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:51:38PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 01:08:44AM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > > Another thing I noticed is this hunk : > > > > +$(shell $(CC) -print-file-name=ld-linux.so.2) \ > > > > On 64bit that should not work since it is ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 and not ld-linux.so.2 > > That's a good point too. > > This seems like an awful lot of fragile hair to go through in order to > avoid using gcc to drive the link. I agree on that. I have pulled the patch from kbuild-next.git, and it will return only when I have found a simple way to handle um. I think it is easy to do but I have not looked at it yet. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
