On Thu, 22 May 2008 08:00:12 +0100 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 23:22 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > This is going to be a bit of a pain for everyone - people are forever > > patching those Kbuild files. > > > > Is there a way in which we can do this in stages? Treat header-y in > > the same manner as unifdef-y, then get all the unifdef-y's switched over > > to header-y and once that is done, remove the "treat header-y in the same > > manner as unifdef-y" support? > > We could. But does that actually reduce the pain, or just spread it > about a bit? It means Stephen and I only need to carry the bulk of the patch for a few days rather than a month or more. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
