On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 10:04:25AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > Jason suggested the send_recv() ops [2], which I liked, but if you prefer to > avoid that, I can restore what we did in v1 and replace the > TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ hack with your point 2 (or use TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ if you > think it is fine). I think it is a pretty notable simplification for the driver as it does not need to implement send, status, req_canceled and more ops. Given the small LOC on the core side I'd call that simplification a win.. Jason
