Hi Steven, On Mon, 2025-02-03 at 15:20 -0800, steven chen wrote: > The extra memory allocated for carrying the IMA measurement list across > kexec is hard-coded as half a PAGE. Make it configurable. > > Define a Kconfig option, IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_MEMORY_KB, to configure the > extra memory (in kb) to be allocated for IMA measurements added during > kexec soft reboot. Ensure the default value of the option is set such > that extra half a page of memory for additional measurements is allocated > for the additional measurements. > > Update ima_add_kexec_buffer() function to allocate memory based on the > Kconfig option value, rather than the currently hard-coded one. > > From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Author: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Suggested-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: steven chen <chenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++ > security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 16 ++++++++++------ > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig > index 475c32615006..54b145ae6096 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig > @@ -321,4 +321,14 @@ config IMA_DISABLE_HTABLE > help > This option disables htable to allow measurement of duplicate records. > > +config IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_MEMORY_KB > + int "Extra memory for IMA measurements added during kexec soft reboot" > + depends on IMA_KEXEC > + default 0 > + help > + IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_MEMORY_KB determines the extra memory to be > + allocated (in kb) for IMA measurements added during kexec soft reboot. > + If set to the default value, an extra half a page of memory for those > + additional measurements will be allocated. -> If set to the default value of 0, an extra half page ... > + > endif > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c > b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c > index d5f004cfeaec..c9c916f69ca7 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c > @@ -128,22 +128,26 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image) > .buf_min = 0, .buf_max = ULONG_MAX, > .top_down = true }; > unsigned long binary_runtime_size; > - > + unsigned long extra_size; > /* use more understandable variable names than defined in kbuf */ > void *kexec_buffer = NULL; > size_t kexec_buffer_size = 0; > int ret; > > /* > - * Reserve an extra half page of memory for additional measurements > - * added during the kexec load. > + * Reserve extra memory for measurements added during kexec. > */ Please rename the variable from "extra_size" to "extra_memory". thanks, Mimmi > - binary_runtime_size = ima_get_binary_runtime_size(); > + if (CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_MEMORY_KB <= 0) > + extra_size = PAGE_SIZE / 2; > + else > + extra_size = CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_MEMORY_KB * 1024; > + binary_runtime_size = ima_get_binary_runtime_size() + extra_size; > + > if (binary_runtime_size >= ULONG_MAX - PAGE_SIZE) > kexec_segment_size = ULONG_MAX; > else > - kexec_segment_size = ALIGN(ima_get_binary_runtime_size() + > - PAGE_SIZE / 2, PAGE_SIZE); > + kexec_segment_size = ALIGN(binary_runtime_size, PAGE_SIZE); > + > if ((kexec_segment_size == ULONG_MAX) || > ((kexec_segment_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) > totalram_pages() / 2)) { > pr_err("Binary measurement list too large.\n");