On Fri Jan 31, 2025 at 3:02 PM EET, Michal Suchánek wrote: > It looks like the timeout_b is used exclusively as the ready timeout *), > with various sources of the value depending on chip type. > > Then increasing it should not cause any problem other than the kernel > waiting longer when the TPM chip is really stuck. > > * There is one instance of use of timeout_b for TPM_STS_VALID in > st33zp24_pm_resume. Possible for you to give a shot for patch and try it out for a while? I'm fine with 2x, or even 4x in this case. BR, Jarkko
