On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 12:59:27PM +0530, Tanya Agarwal wrote:
> From: Tanya Agarwal <tanyaagarwal25699@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Fix typos and spelling errors in security module comments that were
> identified using the codespell tool.
> No functional changes - documentation only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tanya Agarwal <tanyaagarwal25699@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Thanks Günther, for catching this error.
> The irony of having a spelling mistake in a patch that fixes spelling
> mistakes is not lost on me :)
>
> I've fixed it in V2 of the patch. Thank you for the careful review!
>
> V2: fix spelling mistake - s/beeen/been/
>
> security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c | 6 +++---
> security/apparmor/domain.c | 4 ++--
> security/apparmor/label.c | 2 +-
> security/apparmor/lsm.c | 2 +-
> security/apparmor/policy.c | 4 ++--
> security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c | 2 +-
> security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 2 +-
> security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 6 +++---
> security/landlock/ruleset.c | 2 +-
> security/selinux/avc.c | 2 +-
> security/smack/smack.h | 2 +-
> security/smack/smack_access.c | 4 ++--
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 6 +++---
> security/smack/smackfs.c | 2 +-
> security/tomoyo/domain.c | 2 +-
> 15 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> index 9b87556b03a7..cdb8c7419d7e 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> @@ -983,9 +983,9 @@ int process_buffer_measurement(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> }
>
> /*
> - * Both LSM hooks and auxilary based buffer measurements are
> - * based on policy. To avoid code duplication, differentiate
> - * between the LSM hooks and auxilary buffer measurements,
> + * Both LSM hooks and auxiliary based buffer measurements are
> + * based on policy. To avoid code duplication, differentiate
^^^
(Small nit:) This change from two-spaces-after-the-dot to a single
space looks like it happened accidentally. The two-space style is
dominant in the ima_main.c file.
(However, I am not involved in IMA and others have more authority to
review this part. As Paul also said, reviews tend to go smoother when
the scope for the patch is a single subsystem - it makes the
responsibilities clearer.)
> + * between the LSM hooks and auxiliary buffer measurements,
> * retrieving the policy rule information only for the LSM hook
> * buffer measurements.
> */
–Günther
